Nonsectarian: Truth is not the exposition of limitation. He did not tell people about his PhD, in fact actively tried to conceal this information (I demonstrated this earlier), so I must assume he believed he had something to lose, such as followers or control over the minds of others.ĥ. Hawkins charges a lot of money for his teachings. Integrity of purpose: There is nothing to gain or lose. There are abundant examples, a couple of which are: sometimes you “have permission” (from the universe or “God”) to ask questions with AK and sometimes not the date of death is set “karmically” at birth, but the date cannot be known with AK for some reason etc.Ĥ. There are many “mysteries” that arise from his AK pseudoscience. Hawkins has attempted to conceal the secret of where he received his PhD from, as just one example that contradicts this. There are no secrets to be revealed, hidden, or sold, and no magical formulas or “mysteries.”ĪK is only available to those “over 200.” AK also is stated to reveal all secrets, in fact. Availability: It is open to all, non-exclusive. scientific skepticism, when in fact great minds such as Bertrand Russell and Joseph Campbell recognize that science and mysticism are not contradictory, but are one.ģ. them mentality, which continues to be perpetrated by Hawkins by continuously setting up his spirituality vs. There are people above 200 and below 200, which is an us vs. Nonexclusionary: Truth is all-inclusive, nonsecretive, and nonsectarian.ĪK contradicts this. Of course followed by a typical response: Varying results across a large group of people is absolutely inconsistent with Power vs Force.
Should I marry him/her? Should I vote for him/her? You should probabaly learn to listen to your heart here,basically do your best, because as I have now read, the SAME and ACCURATE results are not always returned.īottom line. With all the countless factors that people are citing as reasons why it ISN't working PERFECTLY as stated, one might as well visit a good psychic. I don't doubt that it does in fact work, just not for everyone all the time.
If you get different results, then it simply isn't working as promised. What was so amazing about his book to me was that barring exceptions, EVERYONE who tests ALWAYS gets the EXACT same answser. I am aware of the exceptions that he listed in his book, however, if even the slightest presence of personal ego can distort a reading, one can hardly rely upon the results, AND, there is no way a crowd of 100 people at seminars would ALWAYS return the same results. These were not formally trained scientists, they were everyday people who showed up. This included large groups of over 100 people who showed up to his seminars and not a single discrepancy in testing these people. In Power vs Force, Hawking said that his trials were always 100% accurate. After reading these posts, I feel as though I am reading a bunch of justifications as to why it is NOT ALWAYS accurate. I just finished reading Power vs Force, and yes, I walked away believing that calibration is simple and ALWAYS accurate.